VACC Submission | |
---|---|
June 2005 deputation on the Burrard
Bridge [HTML] |
The bridges were not a part of the Downtown Transportation Plan, but are obviously very important to cyclists. I've compiled a range of city documents relating to the bridges.
Options for the Burrard Bridge were presented at two meetings of the city's Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC), Dec. 2004 and Jan. 2005. The main options were:
The BAC ranked them in this order: 1. removal of two vehicle lanes; 2. outward expansion; 3. hybrid.
A number of groups came together to support the removal option. They noted the following:
Capacity
- Burrard Bridge has low traffic volumes through much of the day and downtown car trips are down 4% from 1996.
- The Granville Bridge (about 500m away) has an excess of capacity
- The Lions Gate Bridge carries twice the traffic volume (60,000-70,000 daily) with half the traffic lanes.
- Capacity is limited by the intersections, not the number of lanes on the bridge
Transit
- Transit priority measures (queue jumper lanes, etc.) and design options for the ends of the bridge have not been investigated.
- With the new transit lanes on Burrard Street, bus travel could potentially be faster than car travel.
Cost
- A 2 lane reallocation is the most low-cost option available ($2M vs. $12M).
Leadership in sustainability
- Lane reallocation would demonstrate leadership on the issue of sustainability and would serve as an excellent showcase for the 2006 World Urban Forum.
- Parallels can be drawn to the Port Mann Bridge expansion project, which the City of Vancouver has publicly opposed.
From the City of Vancouver Downtown Transportation Plan (2005, p. 8)
- "Over the next 20 years...commuter trips on foot and bike are expected to double. Car and truck trips are expected to stay the same."
Excerpt from staff report, 1996 Burrard Bridge lane reallocation trial
- Travel behaviour, within the corridor, was modified in two ways as a result of the pilot project.
- On an average weekday, there were 870 additional cyclists (39% increase) and a decrease of 8800 car occupants (9% decrease). There is very little indication that people were diverted to other routes; consequently, a number of person trips were not made across False Creek. Either these trips went to other destinations or they were discretionary trips that were not made. Overall, 7500 fewer people crossed the bridge each day.
- Vehicular drivers changed their behaviour quickly and adjusted to the installation of the bike lane. Delays of up to 20 minutes were reported early in the week and reduced to a few minutes of delay later in the week.
[Submitted by Better Environmentally Sound Transportation, Heritage Vancouver, Society Promoting Environmental Conservation, Vancouver Area Cycling Coalition, West End Residents' Association]
I've collected some of the many small PDF files from the city website and compiled them into a few larger PDFs, with links below. The city websites are still necessary for context.
In 1996, the city closed one northbound lane on the Burrard Bridge for a one-week trial period, allowing the lane to be used by bicycles instead. Car traffic dropped by 9% (8800 daily trips), and bicycle traffic rose by 39%. However, the trial was highly controversial and media coverage was quite negative, so politicans cancelled the trial early (it was supposed to last six months) and avoided the topic for several years.
I visited the city archives and scanned the missing appendices to the staff reports below.