@comment{{This file has been generated by bib2bib 1.91}}
@comment{{Command line: /usr/bin/bib2bib -ob keyword_smart_growth.bib -c 'keywords: "smart growth"' ref.bib}}
@article{AleTom02,
author = {Don Alexander and Ray Tomalty},
title = {{S}mart {G}rowth and Sustainable Development: challenges,
solutions and policy directions},
year = 2002,
journal = {Local Environment},
volume = 7,
number = 4,
pages = {397--409},
status = {read},
keywords = {urban planning, canada, smart growth}
}
@article{Ant04,
author = {Jerry Anthony},
title = {Do State Growth Management Regulations Reduce Sprawl?},
year = 2004,
journal = {Urban Affairs Review},
volume = 39,
number = 3,
pages = {376--397},
status = {read},
keywords = {urban planning, smart growth},
annote = {
Interesting data, but hard to draw many conclusions. The regression
model's pooling of data is very dodgy... the 1982--1992 data points
and 1992--1997 likely have correlated error terms. I imagine the
data has issues, too---I'm wary of urban density figures,
particularly when they don't define them carefully and had to
analyse every area in the United States.
There are interesting insights, though, particularly regarding Hawaii,
Washington, and Florida. Florida limits development to areas with
adequate infrastructure... but includes ``high level-of-service
roads'' as part of the definition, excluding inner-city and dense
areas with congested roads!
}
}
@article{Dow05,
author = {Anthony Downs},
title = {Smart {G}rowth: Why We Discuss It More Than We Do It},
year = 2005,
journal = {Journal of the American Planning Association},
volume = 71,
number = 4,
pages = {367--378},
status = {read},
keywords = { transport planning, urban form, transit, land use transport link, urban politics, smart growth }
}
@article{Fil03,
author = {Pierre Filion},
title = { Towards Smart Growth? {T}he Difficult Implementation of
Alternatives to Urban Dispersion},
year = 2003,
journal = {Canadian Journal of Urban Research},
volume = 12,
number = 1,
pages = {48--70},
keywords = { urban planning, urban politics, canada, urban form, smart growth},
status = {read},
abstract = {
The smart growth concept has recently achieved prominence within
the planning profession. It represents a reaction to mounting
resentment towards the adverse consequences of prevailing forms of
urbanization: air pollution, high development costs and
deteriorating quality of life. The article examines the possibility
of implementing smart growth proposals within the prevailing
political, economic and value environment. After drawing lessons
from the lack of success of attempts at altering urban development
over the last thirty years, the article proposes two smart growth
strategies. To maintain their implementation potential and capacity
to modify urbanization trends, the strategies avoid clashes with
entrenched preference patterns and powerful interest groups. The
first strategy consists in an expansion of the high-density
transit-oriented compact urban realm into the ambient low-density
car-dependent dispersed realm. The second strategy involves the
creation of mixed-use high-density corridors, hospitable to transit
use and walking, within newly urbanized areas.
},
annote = {
An excellent article, aimed at realistic incremental policies to
change urban densities, the main obstacle to mode share changes.
The solutions he presents are not new at all, but the political
context and discussion of suburban values are worth thinking about.
}
}
@incollection{Kri05,
author = {Alex Krieger},
title = {The Costs---and Benefits?---of Sprawl},
year = 2005,
booktitle = {Sprawl and Suburbia: A {H}arvard {D}esign {M}agazine
Reader},
editor = {William S.~Saunders},
pages = {44--56},
chapter = 5,
publisher = {University of Minnesota Press},
address = {Minneapolis, MN, USA},
status = {read},
keywords = {smart growth, urban planning}
}
@article{Tom02,
author = {Ray Tomalty},
title = {Growth Management in the {V}ancouver Region},
year = 2002,
journal = {Local Environment},
volume = 7,
number = 4,
pages = {431--445},
status = {read},
keywords = {urban planning, canada, smart growth, urban growth boundary},
annote = {
A good article summarizing the history of the GVRD and the
effectiveness of its growth management. Invaluable for anyone new
to the Vancouver planning scene, or for those who just want to step
back momentarily and look at the big picture.
}
}
@article{BerCon00,
author = {P.R.~Berke and M.M.~Conroy},
title = {Are we planning for sustainable development? {A}n evaluation
of 30 comprehensive plans},
year = 2000,
journal = {Journal of the American Planning Assocation},
volume = 66,
pages = {21--33},
keywords = {smart growth, urban planning}
}
@book{Dow94,
author = {Anthony Downs},
title = {New Visions for Metropolitan {A}merica},
year = 1994,
publisher = {The Brookings Institution},
address = {Washington, D.C., USA},
keywords = {urban planning, equity, zoning, urban politics, smart growth},
annote = {
In the first three chapters (the only part I've read), there were
some very interesting discussion of growth management policies,
equity and racial segregation in the USA.
One point I found interesting was the discussion of preferences. In
general, Americans want single-family detached houses, auto-based
travel, free parking and short travel times. The planning system
in many ways guarantees the first two: suburbs have extremely high
minimum standards for housing (low density single-family homes), and
generally provide generous roads and free parking. The last aspect
of preferences cannot be guaranteed due to growth and swamping of
existing roads by new travel, discussed at length in the book.
This is the aspect I find interesting: the system is inherently
biased towards one set of preferences (housing) and limits trading
off housing against travel time---if an individual prefers short
travel times and is willing to accept ``lower quality'' dense
housing in return, that option is rarely available. In other words,
this minimum provision limits choices, a point that Andre Sorensen
has made repeatedly in his discussions in the course I'm taking.
Downs notes that one-third of US households did not live in
single-family homes in 1990, and one-third were renters (presumably
with substantial overlap). He describes the provision of low-cost
housing as a ``trickle-down'' process: since cheap new housing is
prohibited, only degraded older houses are available for those
who cannot afford the suburban single-family home. This process
breaks down when ``net housing construciton is lower than net
household formation''---i.e., periods of rapid growth.
}
}
@article{Dow01,
author = {Anthony Downs},
title = {What Does {S}mart {G}rowth Really Mean?},
year = 2001,
journal = {Planning},
volume = 67,
number = 4,
pages = {20--25},
keywords = {urban planning, smart growth}
}
@techreport{Har01b,
author = {Melanie Hare},
title = {Exploring Growth Management Roles in {O}ntario: Learning from
``Who Does What'' Elsewhere},
year = 2001,
month = sep,
institution = {Ontario Professional Planners Institute},
address = {Toronto, ON, Canada},
keywords = {urban planning, smart growth, canada}
}
@article{MooNel94,
author = {Terry Moore and Arthur C.~Nelson},
title = {Lessons for effective urban-containment and resource-land
preservation policy},
year = 1994,
journal = {Journal of Urban Planning and Development},
volume = 12,
pages = {157--171},
keywords = {urban planning, smart growth, urban growth boundary}
}
@article{Nel92,
author = {Arthur C.~Nelson},
title = {Preserving prime farmland in the face of urbanization:
lessons from {O}regon},
year = 1992,
journal = {Journal of the American Planning Association},
volume = 58,
number = 4,
pages = {467--488},
keywords = {smart growth, urban growth boundary}
}
@article{Nel99,
author = {Arthur C.~Nelson},
title = {Comparing states with and without growth management
regulations based on indicators with policy implications},
year = 1999,
journal = {Land Use Policy},
volume = 16,
pages = {121--127},
keywords = {urban planning, smart growth}
}
@book{NelDunMulBis95,
author = {Arthur C.~Nelson and J.~Duncan and C.~Mullen and K.~Bishop},
title = {Growth Management Principles and Practices},
year = 1995,
publisher = {American Planning Association},
address = {Chicago, IL, USA},
keywords = {smart growth, urban planning}
}
@article{Pen99,
author = {Rolf Pendall},
title = {Do land use controls cause sprawl?},
year = 1999,
journal = {Environment and Planning B},
volume = 26,
number = 4,
pages = {555--571},
keywords = {urban planning, zoning, smart growth}
}
@article{TalKna03,
author = {Emily Talen and Gerrit-Jan Knaap},
title = {Legalizing smart growth: an empirical study of land use
regulation in {I}llinois},
year = 2003,
journal = {Journal of Planning Education and Research},
volume = 22,
pages = {345--359},
keywords = {urban planning, smart growth}
}
@book{Tom97,
author = {Ray Tomalty},
title = {The compact metropolis: Growth management and intensification
in {V}ancouver, {T}oronto, and {M}ontreal},
year = 1997,
address = {Toronto, ON, Canada},
publisher = {ICANN Publications},
keywords = {urban planning, canada, smart growth}
}
@article{Wei99,
author = {J.~Weitz},
title = {From quiet revolution to {S}mart {G}rowth: State growth
management programs, 1960 to 1999},
year = 1999,
journal = {Journal of Planning Literature},
volume = 14,
pages = {267--338},
keywords = {smart growth, urban planning}
}
This file was generated by bibtex2html 1.91.