@comment{{This file has been generated by bib2bib 1.91}}
@comment{{Command line: /usr/bin/bib2bib -ob keyword_intermodal.bib -c 'keywords: "intermodal"' ref.bib}}
@techreport{DooPor94,
author = {J.T.~Doolittle and E.K.~Porter},
title = {Integration of Bicycles and Transit},
year = 1994,
type = {TCRP Synthesis},
number = 4,
institution = {Transportation Research Board, National Research
Council},
address = {Washington, D.C., USA},
keywords = {bicycle planning, intermodal, transit}
}
@article{Mar04,
author = {Karel Martens},
title = {The bicycle as a feedering mode: experiences from three
{E}uropean countries},
year = 2004,
journal = {Transportation Research D},
volume = 9,
number = 4,
pages = {281--294},
abstract = {
Bike-and-ride, or the combined use of bicycle and public transport
for one trip, is a multimodal alternative for the car. This
paper discusses the use of bike-and-ride in three countries
with widely differing bicycle cultures and
infrastructures: the Netherlands, Germany and the UK.
The share of the bicycle in access trips is comparable
to general levels of bicycle ridership in each country,
but only for train services and other fast modes of
public transport. Strong similarities are found
in the characteristics of bike-and-ride trips
and users, in terms of travel distances, travel
motives, and the impact of car availability. The
majority of bike-and-ride users travels between
2 and 5 km to a public transport stop, with
longer access distances reported for faster
modes of public transport. Work and education
are the main travel motives, with the first
dominating the faster modes and the second the
slower modes of public transport. Car
availability hardly influences the choice for a
combined use of bicycle and train, but strongly
affects the levels of bike-and-ride for slower
modes of transport.
},
keywords = {bicycle planning, intermodal}
}
@article{Mar07,
author = {Karel Martens},
title = {Promoting bike-and-ride: the {D}utch experience},
year = 2007,
month = may,
journal = {Transportation Research A},
volume = 41,
number = 4,
pages = {326--338},
keywords = { bicycle planning, transit, intermodal },
abstract = {
The number of policy initiatives to promote the use of
bike-and-ride, or the combined use of bicycle and public transport
for one trip, has grown considerably over the past decade as part
of the search for more sustainable transport solutions. This paper
discusses the experiences with, and impacts of, such initiatives in
the Netherlands. The Dutch measures to promote bicycle use in
access trips have been generally successful. A country-wide program
to upgrade regular and secure bicycle parking at train stations has
led to an increase in user satisfaction and a growth in bicycles
parked at stations. Smaller programs to stimulate the combined use
of bike-and-bus have resulted in an increase in bicycle use, bus
use, and share of infrequent bus passengers. Bicycle lockers at bus
stops are hardly used by bus passengers, due in part to the
dominance of students among bus users as well as the relatively
high price of lockers in comparison to the value of bicycles used
for access trips. Measures to promote the use of the bicycle in
egress trips have met with more varying results. Projects to
introduce leasing bicycles for egress trips have failed to attract
passengers, for both train and bus services. In contrast, the
introduction of flexible rental bicycles at train stations has
resulted in a small reduction in car use, growth in train trips,
and growth in bicycle use for non-recurrent trips. The Dutch
experiences suggest some lessons for promoting bike-and-ride in
countries and cities with a less well-developed bicycle
infrastructure.
}
}
@article{Mey93,
author = {Michael D.~Meyer},
title = {Jumpstarting the move toward multimodal planning},
year = 1993,
month = apr,
journal = {Transportation Research Circular},
volume = 406,
address = {Washington, D.C., USA},
publisher = {National Academy Press},
keywords = {transport planning, intermodal }
}
@techreport{RepPar92,
author = {Michael Replogle and H.~Parcells},
title = {Linking Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities with Transit},
year = 1992,
institution = {Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation},
address = {Washington, D.C., USA},
keywords = {bicycle planning, pedestrian planning, intermodal}
}
@article{Rie00,
author = {Piet Rietveld},
title = {The accessibility of railway stations: the role of the bicycle
in The {N}etherlands},
year = 2000,
month = jan,
journal = {Transportation Research D},
volume = 5,
number = 1,
pages = {71--75},
abstract = {
The market potential of railway services depends on the quality of the
total chain from residence to place of activity. In The Netherlands
where natural conditions and infrastructure are conducive, the
bicycle is a potentially attractive access mode for railways since
it allows travellers to avoid waiting at bus, metro or tram stops.
Especially at the home end the bicycle appears to play a large role
as an access mode with a share of 35\%. At the activity end the
share is much shorter. Implications are discussed for policies
aiming at increasing the share of multimodal trips. Also physical
planning implications are considered.
},
keywords = {bicycle planning, transit, intermodal }
}
@techreport{TayMah96,
author = {Dean B.~Taylor and Hani S.~Mahmassani},
title = {Intermodal bicycle/transit mode choice: survey and nested
logit choice model},
year = 1996,
institution = {Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas
at Austin},
type = {Project},
number = {60056/465570},
address = {Austin, TX, USA},
keywords = {bicycle planning, intermodal, transit}
}
@article{TayMah97,
author = {Dean B.~Taylor and Hani S.~Mahmassani},
title = {Analysis of stated preferences for intermodal bicycle-transit
interfaces},
year = 1997,
journal = {Transportation Research Record},
volume = 1556,
pages = {86--95},
keywords = {bicycle planning, intermodal }
}
This file was generated by bibtex2html 1.91.