keyword_geography.bib

@comment{{This file has been generated by bib2bib 1.91}}
@comment{{Command line: /usr/bin/bib2bib -ob keyword_geography.bib -c 'keywords: "geography"' ref.bib}}
@article{Ber02,
  author = {Brian J.L.~Berry},
  title = {Paradigm Lost},
  year = 2002,
  journal = {Urban Geography},
  volume = 23,
  number = 5,
  pages = {441--445},
  status = {read},
  keywords = {geography},
  annote = {
        A curious slice of the history of geography as a discipline.
    }
}
@article{BosFre06,
  author = {Ron A.~Boschma and Koen Frenken},
  title = {Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards
        and evolutionary economic geography},
  year = 2006,
  journal = {Journal of Economic Geography},
  volume = 6,
  number = 3,
  pages = {273--302},
  status = {read},
  keywords = {economics, geography, economic geography}
}
@article{Bou96,
  author = {Larry S.~Bourne},
  title = {Reurbanization, Uneven Urban Development, and the Debate on
        New Urban Forms},
  year = 1996,
  journal = {Urban Geography},
  volume = 17,
  number = 8,
  pages = {690--713},
  status = {read},
  keywords = {geography, urban form, urban planning},
  annote = {
        Some interesting discussions on infill development. I found his
        description of centre-city abandonment interesting: ``premature
        write-down of the existing built environment.'' That particular
        economic spin on downtown decay summarizes my intuitive dislike for
        rundown centre city buildings. Consider a Victorian or Edwardian
        storefront in downtown Toronto: these are considered too expensive to
        build today in new neighbourhoods, and yet we let the existing
        stock of (valuable!) buildings decay in many parts of the city.

        Bourne discusses an interesting model from Klaassen and van den
        Burg (over many papers). They characterize urban evolution in four
        stages: 1) urbanization; 2) outmigration; 3) disurbanization; and
        4) reurbanization. It's an interesting breakdown for recent urban
        history, particularly in Canadian cities that are generally in
        phase four now.

        Bourne also discusses the poor information/data available on
        single-lot infill sites in cities, and some strange strategies to
        combat urban decay, like Detroit's empowerment/enterprise zone in
        its centre.
    }
}
@article{Fil96,
  author = {Pierre Filion},
  title = { Metropolitan planning objectives and implementation constraints:
            planning in a post-{F}ordist and postmodern age },
  year = 1996,
  journal = {Environment and Planning A},
  volume = 28,
  number = 9,
  pages = {1637--1660},
  keywords = { geography, urban planning, politics, canada, urban form },
  status = {read},
  abstract = {
        Planning faces the predicament that as recommendations become
        bolder possibilities for implementation deteriorate. This is
        imputed to society's transition from a Fordist and modern to a
        post-Fordist and postmodern era. On the one hand, postmodern
        values account for more public participation and heightened
        environmental sensitivity, which translate into proposals for
        alternative forms of urban development. On the other hand, the
        implementation of these proposals is impaired by reduced public
        sector resources as a result of the economic instability
        associated with post-Fordism. Another impediment is the
        difficulty to achieve sufficient support for planning
        objectives in the postmodern context. This context is marked by
        a fragmentation of values, attachment to the existing built
        environment, and suspicion between social groups. The empirical
        focus is on Toronto's bold metropolitan planning proposals.
        Most recent planning documents call for reurbanization efforts,
        a compact urban form, and reduced reliance on the car. In this
        paper I cast doubts, however, on the eventual actualization of
        these proposals by highlighting weaknesses in the present
        and anticipated implementation context. These are tied to
        factors that are specific to Toronto, but also to a greater
        extent to the post-Fordist and postmodern environment.
    },
  annote = {
        A few interesting ideas. He argues that the postmodern attachment of
        value to public participation and plural views could undermine
        processes aimed at changing suburban form to better accommodate
        plurality. He suggests that NIMBYism arises from suspicion
        between factions in a fractured society, and this will in turn
        hinder changes to existing urban form (infill, etc.) and favour
        greenfield development where such arguments can be avoided. In the
        light of his arguments, I find policies such as urban growth
        boundaries more appealing: they prevent greenfield alternatives and
        force NIMBYism to be confronted directly. Toronto already seems to
        be headed in this direction, as social housing projects are
        increasingly recognised as necessary and located in all wards, instead
        of being fought off by all wards.
    }
}
@article{Fil00,
  author = {Pierre Filion},
  title = {Balancing Concentration and Dispersion? Public Policy and
        Urban Structure in {T}oronto},
  year = 2000,
  journal = {Environment and Planning C},
  volume = 18,
  pages = {163--189},
  status = {read},
  quality = 5,
  keywords = { canada, urban planning, geography, urban politics, toronto },
  annote = {
        An excellent, detached and comprehensive overview of postwar trends
        in the Toronto region. The hypothesis that Toronto may have ``the
        best of both worlds'' by having both dispersed and concentrated
        environments is an interesting one, although the retention of that
        status would require both realms to grow at similar rates, which
        has not been the trend in recent decades.
    }
}
@book{GraMar01,
  author = {Stephen Graham and Simon Marvin},
  title = {Splintering Urbanism},
  year = 2001,
  publisher = {Routledge},
  address = {London, UK},
  status = {read},
  keywords = {geography, transport planning}
}
@article{Her98,
  author = {Brita Hermelin},
  title = {Location of Professional Business Services},
  year = 1998,
  journal = {European Urban and Regional Studies},
  volume = 5,
  number = 3,
  pages = {263--275},
  keywords = {location choice, economic geography, firm behaviour},
  abstract = {
        The location pattern of advanced professional business services is a
        matter of interest among scholars in economic geography and
        neighbouring disciplines. This article considers location factors in
        the context of a conceptual discussion as well as a Swedish case-
        study. The conclusions suggest that there are reasons to reevaluate the
        relative importance of different location factors. Although the
        factor of proximity to clients (the market) is important and tends to
        dominate the discussion in much research in geography, it offers only a
        partial explanation of the location of professional business services
        firms. This article produces arguments for the importance of several
        other location factors: professional labour, localization and
        urbanization economies, and the circumstances surrounding the
        establishment of firms as well as their subsequent history.
    },
  status = {read}
}
@incollection{KeiGra98,
  author = {Roger Keil and John Graham},
  title = {Reasserting Nature: Constructing urban environments after
        {F}ordism},
  year = {1998},
  booktitle = {Remaking Reality: Nature at the Amillenium},
  editor = {B.~Braun and N.~Casttree},
  publisher = {Routledge},
  address = {London, UK},
  status = {read},
  annote = {
        Some interesting criticisms of New (Sub)urbanism as a rebranding of
        older modes of subdivision building, in the context of Vaughan.
        I didn't read the article very closely, and I'm not sure what the
        overall thrust is. My sense is that it builds on a quote from Lef91
        to explore the urbanisation of the rural and the ruralisation of
        the urban.
    },
  keywords = {geography, canada, urban planning, new urbanism }
}
@article{Bou91,
  author = {Larry S.~Bourne},
  title = {Recycling urban systems and metropolitan areas: a geographical
        agenda for the 1990s and beyond},
  year = 1991,
  journal = {Economic Geography},
  volume = 67,
  pages = {185--209},
  keywords = {geography, urban planning}
}
@article{Bou92,
  author = {Larry S.~Bourne},
  title = {Self-fulfilling prophecies? Decentralization, inner city
    decline, and the quality of urban life},
  year = 1992,
  journal = {Journal of the American Planning Association},
  volume = 58,
  number = 4,
  pages = {509--513},
  keywords = {urban planning, geography}
}
@book{BunFil00,
  editor = {Trudi Bunting and Pierre Filion},
  title = {{C}anadian Cities in Transition: The Twenty-First Century},
  edition = {2nd},
  year = 2000,
  publisher = {Oxford University Press},
  keywords = {canada, urban planning, geography, transport planning, history, urban economics}
}
@book{Coo90,
  author = {P.~Cook},
  title = {Back to the future: Modernity, postmodernity and locality},
  year = 1990,
  publisher = {Unwin Hyman Ltd.},
  address = {London, UK},
  keywords = {geography}
}
@unpublished{Cop85,
  author = {P.M.~Coppack},
  title = {An exploration of amenity and its role in the development of
    the urban field},
  year = 1985,
  note = {Unpublished Ph.D. thesis},
  institution = {University of Waterloo},
  address = {Waterloo, ON, Canada},
  keywords = {urban planning, geography, canada}
}
@article{Dow98,
  author = {R.~Dowling},
  title = {Neotraditionalism in the suburban landscape: Cultural
        geographies of exclusion in {V}ancouver, {C}anada},
  year = 1998,
  journal = {Urban Geography},
  volume = 19,
  number = 2,
  pages = {105--122},
  keywords = {geography, canada}
}
@book{Fog67,
  author = {R.~Fogelson},
  title = {The Fragmented Metropolis: {L}os {A}ngeles from 1850 to 1930},
  year = 1967,
  publisher = {Harvard University Press},
  address = {Cambridge, MA, USA},
  keywords = {geography, history, urban planning}
}
@article{Gad85,
  author = {Gunter Gad},
  title = {Office location dynamics in {T}oronto: suburbanization and
        central district specialization},
  year = 1985,
  journal = {Urban Geography},
  volume = 6,
  pages = {331--351},
  keywords = {location choice, urban planning, canada, geography}
}
@article{Gra00,
  author = {Stephen Graham},
  title = {Constructing Premium Network Spaces},
  year = 2000,
  journal = {International Journal of Urban and Regional Research},
  volume = 24,
  number = 1,
  pages = {182--200},
  url = {http://estia.arch.auth.gr/Courses/2U2-18/files/Graham_Network_spaces_2000.pdf},
  keywords = {geography, transport planning}
}
@article{GuyGraMar97,
  author = {S.~Guy and Stephen Graham and Simon Marvin},
  title = {Splintering networks: cities and technical networks in 1990s
        {B}ritain},
  year = 1997,
  journal = {Urban Studies},
  volume = 34,
  number = 2,
  pages = {191--216},
  keywords = {geography}
}
@book{Lef91,
  author = {Henri Lefebvre},
  title = {The Production of Space},
  year = 1991,
  publisher = {Blackwell},
  address = {Oxford, UK},
  keywords = {geography}
}
@article{Ley93,
  author = {David Ley},
  title = {Gentrification in Recession: Social Change in Six {C}anadian
        Inner Cities},
  year = 1993,
  journal = {Urban Geography},
  volume = 13,
  number = 3,
  pages = {230--256},
  keywords = {geography, canada, equity}
}
@book{Ley96,
  author = {David Ley},
  title = {The Middle Class and the Making of the Central City},
  year = 1996,
  publisher = {Oxford University Press},
  address = {Oxford, UK},
  keywords = {geography, equity}
}
@article{Rel91,
  author = {E.~Relph},
  title = {Suburban downtowns of the {G}reater {T}oronto {A}rea},
  journal = {The Canadian Geographer},
  year = 1991,
  volume = 35,
  pages = {421--425},
  keywords = {geography, canada}
}
@article{Tal00,
  author = {Emily Talen},
  title = {{N}ew {U}rbanism and the culture of criticism},
  year = 2000,
  journal = {Urban Geography},
  volume = 21,
  number = 4,
  pages = {318--341},
  keywords = {new urbanism, geography}
}
@book{vandenBerDreKla82,
  editor = {van den Berg, L. and R.~Drewett and L.~Klaassen},
  title = {Urban {E}urope: A Study in Growth and Decline},
  year = 1982,
  publisher = {Pergamon},
  address = {London, UK},
  keywords = {geography, urban planning}
}
@incollection{vandenBerKla87,
  author = {van den Berg, L. and L.~Klaassen},
  title = {The contagiousness of urban decline},
  editor = {van den Berg, L. and L.~Burns and L.~Klaassen},
  booktitle = {Spatial Cycles},
  year = 1987,
  pages = {84--99},
  publisher = {Gower},
  address = {London, UK},
  keywords = {geography, urban planning}
}
@techreport{Van64,
  author = {J.~Vance},
  title = {Geography and Urban Evolution in the {S}an {F}rancisco {B}ay
        {A}rea},
  year = 1964,
  institution = {Institute of Governmental Studies, University of
        California},
  address = {Berkeley, CA, USA},
  keywords = {transport planning, urban planning, history, geography}
}

This file was generated by bibtex2html 1.91.