@comment{{This file has been generated by bib2bib 1.91}}
@comment{{Command line: /usr/bin/bib2bib -ob keyword_equity.bib -c 'keywords: "equity"' ref.bib}}
@incollection{Ban94,
author = {David Banister},
title = {Equity and Acceptability Questions in Internalising the Social
Costs of Transport},
booktitle = {Internalising the Social Costs of Transportation},
publisher = {OECD European Conference of Ministers of Transport},
year = 1994,
pages = {153--171},
keywords = {urban economics, equity},
status = {read},
annoteurl = { http://davidpritchard.org/sustrans/Ban94/index.html }
}
@article{Blu04,
author = {Evelyn Blumenberg},
title = {En-gendering effective planning: spatial mismatch, low-income
women, and transportation policy},
year = 2004,
journal = {Journal of the American Planning Association},
volume = 70,
number = 3,
pages = {269--281},
status = {read},
keywords = {equity, gender, transport planning, urban planning}
}
@incollection{Dek04,
author = {Devaiyoti Deka},
title = {Social and Environmental Justice Issues in Urban
Transportation},
year = 2004,
booktitle = {The Geography of Urban Transportation},
editor = {Susan Hanson and Genevieve Giuliano},
edition = {3rd},
chapter = 12,
publisher = {Guildford Press},
address = {New York City, NY, USA},
pages = {332--355},
status = {read},
keywords = {transport planning, equity},
quality = 4,
annote = {
A good overview of the full breadth of equity issues in
transportation planning. A few distinctive points: 1) access to
health care is often ignored. 2) Residential dispersal is a valid
solution to spatial mismatch, but transportation is usually touted
as the politically easier solution instead. My thoughts: in some ways,
providing
subsidised transit connections for reverse commutes is a subsidy to
suburbanising businesses, giving them access to low-wage employees
at a low-cost location. Without that access, they might choose to
locate closer to low-wage workers. 3) In addition to poor/rich
urban/suburban, short trip/long trip cross-subsidies, there are also
peak/off-peak trip cross-subsidies: off-peak travellers (e.g.,
low income midnight shift workers, part-time workers) do not
require the expensive ``peaked'' service of the regular workday.
(To be fair, late night service is also often heavily subsidised.)
4) The rationale for federal/state funding of transit projects in
suburban areas, despite inefficiency: suburbs pay a substantial chunk
of taxes, and need to see some returns. If the funds didn't go
through a federal level, this might not be an issue: cities could
fund their own transit projects... 5) The environmental justice
discussion is interesting, particularly the details of the various
Bus Riders' Unions. 6) Rich drivers generate more pollution than
poor drivers, both from longer trips and from lower fuel
efficiency.
}
}
@article{GarTay99,
author = {Mark Garrett and Brian Taylor},
title = {Reconsidering Social Equity in Public Transit},
year = 1999,
journal = {Berkeley Planning Journal},
volume = 13,
pages = {6--27},
status = {read},
keywords = {equity, transport planning, finance},
annote = {
Some interesting notes on racial/income equity in transit service.
Apparently, transit users were only 20\% minorities in 1977--but
that rose to 63\% by 1995! I hadn't realised that the racialisation
of transport in the USA was so recent. Also, some interesting notes
on US funding formulas for transit: a heavy weight on service area
coverage, and little weight on ridership achieved.
}
}
@book{Jac61,
author = {Jane Jacobs},
title = {The Death and Life of Great American Cities},
year = 1961,
publisher = {Vintage},
address = {New York City, NY, USA},
rating = 5,
keywords = {urban planning, equity, transport planning, general interest, sociology, streets, pedestrian planning, accessibility, urban design},
status = {read},
annoteurl = { http://davidpritchard.org/sustrans/Jac61/index.html }
}
@incollection{Jac95,
author = {Michael Jacobs},
title = {Sustainability and `the {M}arket': A Typology of Environmental
Economics},
year = 1995,
editor = {Robyn Eckersley},
booktitle = {Markets, the State and the Environment},
pages = {46--70},
publisher = {MacMillan},
address = {Melbourne, Australia},
annote = {
An interesting essay. Jacobs examines the schools within environmental
economics, with a fairly critical eye. He discusses five classes:
A. traditional (status quo); B. neoclassical I: financial incentives
(tradable quotas); C. neoclassical II: financial incentives (taxes,
etc.); D. neoclassical III: monetary valuation (cost/benefit analyses);
and E. property rights. He looks at how they address four
questions: 1. ethics of environmental objective setting (what level of
environmental protection should society choose?); 2. institutions
(how should this level be chosen?); 3. instruments (how should
this level be achieved?); 4. distribution (how shold costs/benefits
be distributed within society). He contrasts the environmental
economists with his own more political school, an
``environmental democracy'' based on sustainability principles.
Generally, he seems to be favourable to B and C, which study only
instruments; he sees these as tools compatible with environmental
democracy. He is less kind to D and E, which try to answer question
2; he argues that they are unlikely to achieve sustainability, due
to the market's inherent tendency to discount the future. He points
out many flaws in his own preference (a democratic institution to
make decisions), but prefers its basis in a public debate of ethics.
},
status = {read},
keywords = {environmental economics, economics, equity}
}
@book{Kay97,
author = {Jane Holtz Kay},
title = {Asphalt Nation},
year = 1997,
publisher = {University of California Press},
address = {Berkeley, CA, USA},
keywords = {general interest, history, equity},
status = {read}
}
@techreport{LevGar00,
author = {Jonathan Levine and Yaakov Garb},
title = {Evaluating the Promise and Hazards of Congestion Pricing
Proposals; An Access Centered Approach},
year = 2000,
institution = {Floersheimer Institute for Policy Studies},
address = {Jerusalem, Israel},
number = {2/11},
url = {http://vtpi.org/levgarb.pdf},
keywords = {congestion pricing, equity, accessibility},
status = {read}
}
@article{LevGar02,
author = {Jonathan Levine and Yaakov Garb},
title = {Congestion Pricing's Conditional Promise: Promotion of
Accessibility or Mobility?},
year = 2002,
journal = {Transport Policy},
volume = 9,
number = 3,
pages = {179--188},
keywords = {congestion pricing, equity, accessibility},
status = {read},
url = {http://www.itdp.org/read/Levine\&Garb(2002).pdf}
}
@article{LevIna04,
author = {Jonathan Levine and Aseem Inam},
title = {The market for transportation-land use integration: do
developers want smarter growth than regulations allow?},
year = 2004,
month = nov,
journal = {Transportation},
volume = 31,
number = 4,
pages = {409--427},
status = {read},
keywords = {urban planning, land use transport link, equity, zoning},
abstract = {
Transportation and land use research of the past decade has focused
in large part on the question of whether manipulating land uses in
the direction of ``smart growth'' alternatives can reduce vehicle
miles traveled (VMT) or otherwise improve travel behavior. Yet the
notion of ``manipulating'' land uses implies that the alternative
is somehow self-organized or market-based. This view appears to
underestimate the extent to which current planning interventions in
the United States---largely focused on lowering development
densities, mandating ample road and parking designs, and separating
land uses---impose an auto-oriented template on most new
development. Rather than a market failure, the paucity of ``smart
growth'' alternatives may be a planning failure---the result of
municipal regulatory exclusion. This problem definition would shift
the burden of proof for policy reform, as uncertainty in
travel-behavior benefits would hardly justify the continuation of
exclusionary regulations. If municipal regulations in fact
constrain alternatives to low-density auto-oriented development,
one would expect developers to perceive unsatisfied market interest
in such development. This article studies, through a national
survey (676 respondents), US developers' perceptions of the market
for pedestrian- and transit-oriented development forms. Overall,
respondents perceive considerable market interest in alternative
development forms, but believe that there is inadequate supply of
such alternatives relative to market demand. Developer-respondents
attribute this gap between supply and demand principally to local
government regulation. When asked how the relaxation of these
regulations would affect their product, majorities of developers
indicated that such liberalization woud lead them to develop in a
denser and more mixed-use fashion, particularly in close-in
suburban locales. Results are interpreted in favor of land-policy
reform based on the expansion of choice in transportation and land
use. This view contrasts with a more prevalent approach which
conditions policy interventions on scientific evidence of
travel-behavior modification.
},
annote = {
An excellent article, rebutting the claims of many others in the
research community. The abstract is an excellent summary of the
points made in this article. References BoaCra01, EwiCer01, Cra99
and Dow92. The latter is quoted: ``[T]he belief that sprawl is
caused primarily by market failures is based on the false
assumption that there is a freely operating land use market in US
metropolitan areas. No metropolitan area has anything remotely
approaching a free land use market because of local regulations
adopted for parochial political, social and fiscal purposes.''
}
}
@article{LevInaTor05,
author = {Jonathan Levine and Aseem Inam and Gwo-Wei Torng},
title = {A Choice-Based Rationale for Land Use and Transportation
Alternatives: Evidence from {B}oston and {A}tlanta},
year = 2005,
journal = {Journal of Planning Education and Research},
volume = 24,
pages = {317--330},
doi = {10.1177/0739456X04267714},
keywords = {land use transport link, equity, travel behaviour, zoning},
quality = 5,
annote = {
Some great equity context, including the Tiebout hypothesis.
}
}
@techreport{Lit04,
author = {Todd A.~Litman},
title = {Pay-As-You-Drive Pricing for Insurance Affordability},
year = 2004,
month = may,
institution = {Victoria Transport Policy Institute},
address = {Victoria, BC, Canada},
keywords = {transportation demand management, equity, insurance},
url = {http://www.vtpi.org/payd_aff.pdf},
status = {read}
}
@techreport{Lit04b,
author = {Todd A.~Litman},
title = {Parking Requirements Impacts on Housing Affordability},
year = 2004,
month = jun,
institution = {Victoria Transport Policy Institute},
address = {Victoria, BC, Canada},
keywords = {parking, urban planning, transportation demand management, equity},
url = {http://vtpi.org/park-hou.pdf},
status = {read},
annote = {
A very interesting read. Litman raises a number of issues
associated with housing that I hadn't considered---my first
reaction is to question Vancouver's downtown development patterns.
Are parking requirements responsible for the tower fad, by making
townhouse and four-story apartment development uneconomic for
developers? On interesting bit of trivia: curb cuts reduce
onstreet parking capacity. His parking management solutions
are quite valuable and innovative ideas, and the studies he cites
in Victoria and Mississauga are useful; I should follow up on all
of his references. Of the management solutions, the two ideas I
found novel were: shared parking, where apartments and businesses
share spaces due to opposite peak demand times - very practical for
residential downtowns; transportation management associations, where a
neighbourhood organisation is formed to trade parking in a
neighbourhood.
I was initially convinced by his
arguments about reducing developer incentive to create low-income
housing, but I'm now a little skeptical; figure 12, in particular,
says to me that in a scenario where 0 parking spaces are required,
developers will have a huge incentive to produce high income
housing, since the relative profit difference will be so much
greater. Of course, this ignores the entire demand side of the
equation. Overall, I think more analysis is needed to determine the
real effect on developers.
}
}
@article{SanRoj04,
author = {Georgina Santos and Laurent Rojey},
title = {Distributional impacts of road pricing: the truth behind the
myth},
year = 2004,
month = feb,
journal = {Transportation},
volume = 31,
number = 1,
pages = {21--42},
keywords = {congestion pricing, equity},
status = {read},
abstract = {
This paper shows that road pricing can be regressive, progressive
or neutral, and refutes the generalised idea that road pricing is
always regressive. The potential distributional impacts of a road
pricing scheme are assessed in three English towns. It is found
that impacts are town specific and depend on where people live,
where people work and what mode of transport they use to go to
work. Initial impacts may be progressive even before any
compensation scheme for losers is taken into account. When the
situation before the scheme is implemented is such that majority of
drivers entering the area where the scheme would operate come from
households with incomes above the average, it can be expected that,
once the scheme is implemented, these drivers coming from rich
households will continue to cross the cordon and will be prepared
to pay the charge. In such a case the overall effect will be that
on average, rich people will pay the toll and poor people will not.
}
}
@incollection{SpiWeg00,
author = {Klaus Spiekermann and Michael Wegener},
title = {Freedom from the Tyranny of Zones: Towards New {GIS}-based
Spatial Models},
editor = {A.~Stewart Fotheringham and Michael Wegener},
booktitle = {Spatial Models and {GIS}: New Potential and New Models},
year = 2000,
publisher = {Taylor and Francis},
address = {London, UK},
pages = {45--61},
keywords = {geographic information systems, spatial modelling, transport modelling, equity},
status = {read},
annoteurl = { http://davidpritchard.org/sustrans/FotWeg00/index.html }
}
@article{Tie56,
author = {Charles Tiebout},
title = {A pure theory of local public expenditures},
year = 1956,
journal = {Journal of Political Economy},
volume = 64,
number = 5,
pages = {416--424},
keywords = {urban politics, equity, zoning}
}
@article{Tiw03,
author = {Geetam Tiwari},
title = {Transport and land-use policies in {D}elhi},
year = 2003,
journal = {Bulletin of the World Health Organization},
volume = 81,
pages = {444--450},
status = {read},
keywords = {urban planning, transport planning, equity}
}
@techreport{ACRBAH91,
author = {{Advisory Commission on Regulatory Barriers to Affordable
Housing}},
title = {``Not {I}n {M}y {B}ack {Y}ard'': Removing Barriers to Affordable
Housing},
year = 1991,
month = jul,
institution = {U.S.~Department of Housing and Urban Development},
address = {Washington, D.C., USA},
keywords = {equity, urban planning}
}
@article{Bur00,
author = {Elizabeth Burton},
title = {The compact city: Just or just compact? {A} preliminary analysis},
year = 2000,
journal = {Urban Studies},
volume = 37,
number = 11,
pages = {1969--2001},
priority = 5,
keywords = {equity, urban form}
}
@article{Cer84b,
author = {Robert Cervero},
title = {Cost and performance impacts of transit subsidy programs},
year = 1984,
journal = {Transportation Research A},
volume = 18,
pages = {407--413},
keywords = {equity, transit, finance}
}
@article{Cer90,
author = {Robert Cervero},
title = {Transit Pricing Research: A Review and Synthesis},
year = 1990,
journal = {Transportation},
volume = 17,
pages = {117--139},
keywords = {transit, finance, equity}
}
@article{Cer90b,
author = {Robert Cervero},
title = {Profiling profitable bus routes},
year = 1990,
journal = {Transportation Quarterly},
volume = 44,
pages = {183--201},
keywords = {transit, finance, equity}
}
@book{Dow94,
author = {Anthony Downs},
title = {New Visions for Metropolitan {A}merica},
year = 1994,
publisher = {The Brookings Institution},
address = {Washington, D.C., USA},
keywords = {urban planning, equity, zoning, urban politics, smart growth},
annote = {
In the first three chapters (the only part I've read), there were
some very interesting discussion of growth management policies,
equity and racial segregation in the USA.
One point I found interesting was the discussion of preferences. In
general, Americans want single-family detached houses, auto-based
travel, free parking and short travel times. The planning system
in many ways guarantees the first two: suburbs have extremely high
minimum standards for housing (low density single-family homes), and
generally provide generous roads and free parking. The last aspect
of preferences cannot be guaranteed due to growth and swamping of
existing roads by new travel, discussed at length in the book.
This is the aspect I find interesting: the system is inherently
biased towards one set of preferences (housing) and limits trading
off housing against travel time---if an individual prefers short
travel times and is willing to accept ``lower quality'' dense
housing in return, that option is rarely available. In other words,
this minimum provision limits choices, a point that Andre Sorensen
has made repeatedly in his discussions in the course I'm taking.
Downs notes that one-third of US households did not live in
single-family homes in 1990, and one-third were renters (presumably
with substantial overlap). He describes the provision of low-cost
housing as a ``trickle-down'' process: since cheap new housing is
prohibited, only degraded older houses are available for those
who cannot afford the suburban single-family home. This process
breaks down when ``net housing construciton is lower than net
household formation''---i.e., periods of rapid growth.
}
}
@article{Eng93,
author = {Kim V.L.~England},
title = {Suburban Pink Collar Ghettos: the Spatial Entrapment of
Women?},
year = 1993,
journal = {Annals of the Association of American Geographers},
volume = 83,
number = 2,
pages = {225--242},
keywords = {equity, gender, urban planning}
}
@article{Ham75,
author = {Bruce W.~Hamilton},
title = {Zoning and property taxation in a system of local
governments},
year = 1975,
journal = {Urban Studies},
volume = 12,
pages = {205--211},
keywords = {zoning, equity, urban planning}
}
@article{HanPra94,
author = {Susan Hanson and Geraldine Pratt},
title = {On Suburban Pink Collar Ghettos: The Spatial Entrapment of
Women? by {K}im {E}ngland},
year = 1994,
journal = {Annals of the Association of American Geographers},
volume = 84,
number = 3,
pages = {500--504},
keywords = {equity, gender, urban planning}
}
@techreport{Har93,
author = {Patrick H.~Hare},
title = {Making Housing Affordable by Reducing Second Car Ownership},
year = 1993,
month = apr,
institution = {Patrick Hare Planning and Design},
address = {Washington, D.C., USA},
keywords = {transport planning, equity, parking}
}
@techreport{Har95,
author = {Patrick H.~Hare},
title = {Planning, Transportation, and the Home Economics of Reduced
Car Ownership; Planning as if Household Budgets Mattered},
year = 1995,
month = apr,
institution = {Patrick Hare Planning and Design},
address = {Washington, D.C., USA},
keywords = {transport planning, equity, parking}
}
@article{HayTri91,
author = {A.~Hay and E.~Trinder},
title = {Concepts of Equity, Fairness and Justice Expressed by Local
Transport Policy Makers},
year = 1991,
journal = {Environment and Planning C},
volume = 9,
number = 4,
pages = {453--465},
keywords = {equity, transport planning}
}
@article{IhlSjo89,
author = {K.~Ihlandfeldt and D.~Sjoquist},
title = {The Impact of Job Decentralization on the Economic Welfare of
Central City Blacks},
year = 1989,
journal = {Journal of Urban Economics},
volume = 26,
pages = {110--130},
keywords = {sociology, equity, urban economics, urban planning, urban form}
}
@book{JakWil92,
author = {John A.~Jakle and David Wilson},
title = {Derelict Landscapes: The Wasting of {A}merica's Built
Environment},
publisher = {Rowman \& Littlefield},
year = 1992,
address = {Savage, MD, USA},
keywords = {urban planning, sociology, equity}
}
@article{JiaWac98,
author = {Wenya Jia and Martin Wachs},
title = {Parking and Affordable Housing},
year = 1998,
journal = {Access Magazine},
volume = 13,
pages = {22--25},
keywords = {transport planning, equity, parking}
}
@techreport{JiaWac98b,
author = {Wenya Jia and Martin Wachs},
title = {Parking and Housing Affordability: A Case Study of {S}an
{F}rancisco},
year = 1998,
institution = {University of California Transportation Center},
type = {Research Paper},
number = 380,
keywords = {transport planning, equity, parking},
url = {http://www.uctc.net/scripts/countdown.pl?380.pdf}
}
@article{JiaWac99,
author = {Wenya Jia and Martin Wachs},
title = {Parking and Housing Affordability: A Case Study of {S}an
{F}rancisco},
year = 1999,
journal = {Transportation Research Record},
volume = 1685,
keywords = {transport planning, equity, parking},
pages = {156--160}
}
@article{Kai93,
author = {J.~Kain},
title = {The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: Three Decades Later},
year = 1993,
journal = {Housing Policy Debate},
volume = 3,
pages = {371--460},
keywords = {sociology, equity, urban economics, urban planning, urban form }
}
@book{KruFor90,
author = {N.~Krumholtz and J.~Forester},
title = {Making Equity Planning Work: Leadership in the Public Sector},
year = 1990,
publisher = {Temple University Press},
keywords = {equity, transport planning}
}
@article{Kwa99,
author = {Mei-Po Kwan},
title = {Gender, the Home-Work Link, and Space-Time Patterns of
Nonemployment Activities},
year = 1999,
month = oct,
journal = {Economic Geography},
volume = 75,
number = 4,
pages = {370--394},
keywords = {equity, transport planning}
}
@mastersthesis{Lau07,
author = {Sabrina Lau},
title = {Towards Inclusive Public Transport: Immigrant Mothers and
their Daily Mobility},
year = 2007,
school = {University of Toronto},
address = {Toronto, ON, Canada},
keywords = {equity, transit}
}
@article{Law99,
author = {Robin Law},
title = {Beyond `women and transport': towards new geographies of
gender and daily mobility},
year = 1999,
journal = {Progress in Human Geography},
volume = 23,
number = 4,
pages = {567--588},
keywords = {equity, gender, transport planning}
}
@article{Ley93,
author = {David Ley},
title = {Gentrification in Recession: Social Change in Six {C}anadian
Inner Cities},
year = 1993,
journal = {Urban Geography},
volume = 13,
number = 3,
pages = {230--256},
keywords = {geography, canada, equity}
}
@book{Ley96,
author = {David Ley},
title = {The Middle Class and the Making of the Central City},
year = 1996,
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
address = {Oxford, UK},
keywords = {geography, equity}
}
@inproceedings{McA83,
author = {Ann Mc{A}fee},
title = {The Renewed Inner City: Is One Out of Three Sufficient?},
year = 1983,
month = jan,
booktitle = {New Neighbourhood International Forum},
address = {Toronto, ON, Canada},
keywords = {equity, canada}
}
@incollection{McA90,
author = {Ann Mc{A}fee},
title = {Four Decades of Geographical Impact by {C}anadian Social
Housing Policies},
year = 1990,
booktitle = {Studies in {C}anadian Regional Geography: Essay in Honour
of {J.~L}ewis {R}obinson},
editor = {B.M.~Barr},
series = {BC Geographical Series},
number = 37,
pages = {92--108},
publisher = {Tantalus Research},
address = {Vancouver, BC, Canada},
keywords = {equity, canada}
}
@book{MasDen93,
author = {D.~Massey and N.~Denton},
title = {American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the
Underclass},
year = 1993,
publisher = {Harvard University Press},
address = {Cambridge, MA, USA},
keywords = {sociology, equity, urban planning}
}
@book{Mor78,
author = {Richard Morris},
title = {Bum Rap on {A}merica's Cities: The Real Causes of Urban
Decay},
publisher = {Prentice-Hall},
year = 1978,
address = {Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA},
keywords = {urban planning, sociology, equity}
}
@techreport{NelNyg02,
author = {{Nelson/Nygaard Consulting}},
title = {Housing Shortage / Parking Surplus},
year = 2002,
institution = {Transportation and Land Use Coalition},
address = {San Francisco, CA, USA},
url = {http://www.transcoalition.org/reports/housing_s/housing_shortage_home.html},
keywords = {urban planning, equity, parking}
}
@article{Pas96,
author = {Hafiz A.~Pasha},
title = {Suburban minimum lot zoning and spatial equilibrium},
year = 1996,
journal = {Journal of Urban Economics},
volume = 40,
number = 1,
pages = {1--12},
keywords = {zoning, equity, urban economics, urban planning}
}
@techreport{PucRen01,
author = {John Pucher and John L.~Renne},
title = {Socioeconomics of Urban Travel: Evidence from the 2001
{NHTS}},
year = 2001,
institution = {Vorhees Transportation Policy Institute, Rutgers
University},
address = {New Brunswick, NJ, USA},
url = {http://policy.rutgers.edu/tpi/docs/ajpharticle.pdf},
keywords = {equity, transport planning}
}
@article{RepHoo93,
author = {Michael Replogle and Walter Hook},
title = {Improving Access for the Poor in Urban Areas},
year = 1993,
journal = {Race, Poverty \& the Environment},
volume = 6,
number = 1,
pages = {48--50},
keywords = {transport planning, equity}
}
@article{Sho95b,
author = {W.~Shore},
title = {Recentralization: the single answer to more than a dozen
{U}nited {S}tates problems and a major answer to poverty},
year = 1995,
journal = {Journal of the American Planning Association},
volume = 61,
number = 4,
pages = {496--503},
keywords = {urban form, urban planning, equity}
}
@techreport{SPUR98,
author = {SPUR},
title = {Reducing Housing Costs by Rethinking Parking Requirements},
year = 1998,
institution = {The {S}an {F}rancisco Planning and Urban Research
Association},
url = {http://www.spur.org/documents/spurhsgpkg.pdf},
keywords = {urban planning, equity, parking}
}
@article{Wac89b,
author = {Martin Wachs},
title = {{U.S.} transit subsidy policy: In need of reform},
year = 1989,
journal = {Science},
volume = 244,
pages = {1545--1549},
keywords = {equity, transit}
}
@inproceedings{WegSpi96b,
author = {Michael Wegener and Klaus Spiekermann},
title = {Efficient, equitable and ecological urban structures},
editor = {D.A.~Hensher and J.~King},
year = 1996,
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 7th World Conference on Transport
Research},
volume = 2,
publisher = {Pergamon},
address = {Oxford, UK},
keywords = {transport modelling, equity}
}
@article{Whe93,
author = {William C.~Wheaton},
title = {Land capitalization, {T}iebout mobility and the role of zoning
regulations},
year = 1993,
journal = {Journal of Urban Economics},
volume = 34,
pages = {102--117},
keywords = {urban planning, zoning, urban economics, equity}
}
This file was generated by bibtex2html 1.91.