Many years ago, I found an excellent resource for transit modelling: slides from a series of 2006-2009 workshops held by the US Federal Transit Administration (FTA) advising agencies applying for federal funding for rapid transit construction under the “New Starts” funding program. It’s very deeply buried on their website, and since then I’ve seen very few people reference this material, nor have I seen it assembled into a formal report.
So, for those interested – I’ve pulled together an easier-to-use table of contents to the three separate workshops, and tried to “deep link” into them to make it easier to browse and find the material. Enjoy!
UPDATE April 2016 – FTA has reorganized their website and the reports are no longer available there. I’ve mirrored everything here on my website.
2006 Workshop
Workshop held in June 2006 in Minneapolis.
- Introduction
- “Allowances” in Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness
- Benefits from Changes in Other Transit Attributes
- Evaluation of Highway Congestion Relief Benefits
- Mobility Benefits from Variable Trip Tables
- Mobility Benefits from Variable Trip Ends
- Predicted and Actual Ridership on New Starts Projects
- Library of Survey Data for Quality Control on Forecasts for New Starts Projects
- CTPP-based Aggregate Model
- Semi-independent Forecasts
- Additional Measures for Quality Control of New Starts Forecasts
- Summit Update
- Early Quality-of-Service Analysis of the Alternatives
- Dealing with Uncertainties in New Starts Forecasts
- Tracking the Accuracy of Transit Forecasts
- Properties of Travel Models for New Starts Forecasting
- Calibration and Validation
- Methods for Transit Data Collection
- Preservation and Analysis of New Starts Travel Forecasts
2007 Workshop
Workshop held in September 2007 in St. Louis, MI.
- Welcome
- Status Report
- Properties of Models
- Data Collection
- Calibration/Validation
- Network Design/Testing with APC Data (Portland Metro)
- Pathbuilder Calibration with Data on Ridership Patterns (Bill Woodford, AECOM)
- Mode Choice Calibration with Data on Ridership Patterns (Bill Davidson, Parsons Brinckerhoff)
- Standard Reporting/QC
- Lifting the Cap
- CTPP-Based QC Forecasts
- ARRF Applications (Dave Schmitt, AECOM)
- Applications in Milwaukee, Kansas City, and St. Louis (Yasasvi Popuri, Cambridge Systematics)
- Alternative-Specific Effects
- BRT and Path Choice with an Older Pathbuilder (Jeffrey M. Bruggeman, AECOM)
- Isolation of Trips and Travel Time on a Project in a Multipath Environment (Jennifer John, TriMet)
- ASEs for the New Britain-Hartford Busway (Capital Region COG)
- Uncertainty Analysis
- Before-After Studies
- Performance Tracking
- Transit Path Choices
- Path Choice with Substantial Reliance on Discrete-Choice Models (Bill Davidson, Parsons Brinckerhoff)
- Path Choice with Principal Reliance on Networks and Path-builders (Bill Woodford, AECOM)
- Transit Path-Building: “To Multipath or Not to Multipath” – The Denver Experience (David Kurth, Cambridge Systematics)
- Telling a Good Story
- Economic Development
- Wrap-Up
2009 Workshop
Held in March 2009 in Phoenix, AZ and Tampa, FL.
Day 1: Summit Training
- Summit: Introduction
- Summit: Analytical Reporting
- Summit: Summit Basics
- Summit: User Benefits
- Summit Examples
Day 2: Workshop
- Welcome
- Lessons Learned, 2003-2008
- Guidance
- Data on Ridership Patterns – Collection Methods
- Data on Ridership Patterns – Some Examples
- Pilot Tests for 2008 On-Board Survey in Columbus, Ohio (Dave Schmitt, AECOM)
- Ancillary Counts for 2008 Tri-Rail On-Board Survey in Florida
- Quality Control Checks for 2007 DART On-Board Survey (Arash Mirzaei, NCTCOG)
- Planning for 2008 On-Board Surveys in Fort Worth and Denton(Arash Mirzaei, NCTOG)
- The ARRF II Model
- Model Testing – Methods
- Model Testing – Some Examples
- Model Testing with 2007 Tri-Rail On-Board Survey Data (David Schmitt, AECOM)
- Pathbuilder Tests Using 2007 DART On-Board Survey (Arash Mirzaei, NCTOG)
- Analytical Support of Cases for Projects
- Uncertainty Analysis
- Uncertainties in Honolulu (Bill Davidson, PB)
- Before-and-After Studies – Methods
- Before-and-After Studies – Examples
- Before-and-After Study for Interstate MAX LRT in Portland
- Newark-Elizabeth Rail Link (Bill Woodford, AECOM)
- Charlotte South Corridor LRT (Bill Woodford, AECOM)
- Simplified Methods for Small Starts
- Current Research
- Wrap-Up