@comment{{This file has been generated by bib2bib 1.91}}
@comment{{Command line: /usr/bin/bib2bib -ob keyword_zoning.bib -c 'keywords: "zoning"' ref.bib}}
@techreport{CV04,
author = {{City of Vancouver}},
title = {Parking By-law},
number = {6059},
type = {By-law},
year = 2004,
address = {Vancouver, BC, Canada},
institution = {{City of Vancouver}},
status = {read},
url = {http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/BYLAWS/PARKING/Parking.htm},
keywords = {parking, zoning, canada}
}
@book{Dow92,
author = {Anthony Downs},
title = {Stuck in Traffic: Coping with Peak-Hour Traffic Congestion},
year = 1992,
publisher = {Brookings Institution Press},
address = {Washington, D.C., USA},
keywords = { transport planning, congestion pricing, transportation demand management, transit, land use transport link, urban form, induced travel, zoning },
status = {read},
annoteurl = {http://davidpritchard.org/sustrans/Dow92/index.html}
}
@book{Dow04,
author = {Anthony Downs},
title = {Still Stuck in Traffic: Coping with Peak-Hour Traffic Congestion},
year = 2004,
publisher = {Brookings Institution Press},
address = {Washington, D.C., USA},
status = {read},
keywords = { transport planning, congestion pricing, transportation demand management, transit, land use transport link, urban form, induced travel, zoning },
annoteurl = {http://davidpritchard.org/sustrans/Dow92/index.html}
}
@article{Gra02,
author = {Jill Grant},
title = {Mixed Use in Theory and Practice: {C}anadian Experience with
Implementing a Planning Principle},
year = 2002,
journal = {Journal of the American Planning Association},
volume = 68,
number = 1,
pages = {71--84},
quality = 1,
status = {read},
keywords = {canada, urban planning, urban form, zoning}
}
@article{LevIna04,
author = {Jonathan Levine and Aseem Inam},
title = {The market for transportation-land use integration: do
developers want smarter growth than regulations allow?},
year = 2004,
month = nov,
journal = {Transportation},
volume = 31,
number = 4,
pages = {409--427},
status = {read},
keywords = {urban planning, land use transport link, equity, zoning},
abstract = {
Transportation and land use research of the past decade has focused
in large part on the question of whether manipulating land uses in
the direction of ``smart growth'' alternatives can reduce vehicle
miles traveled (VMT) or otherwise improve travel behavior. Yet the
notion of ``manipulating'' land uses implies that the alternative
is somehow self-organized or market-based. This view appears to
underestimate the extent to which current planning interventions in
the United States---largely focused on lowering development
densities, mandating ample road and parking designs, and separating
land uses---impose an auto-oriented template on most new
development. Rather than a market failure, the paucity of ``smart
growth'' alternatives may be a planning failure---the result of
municipal regulatory exclusion. This problem definition would shift
the burden of proof for policy reform, as uncertainty in
travel-behavior benefits would hardly justify the continuation of
exclusionary regulations. If municipal regulations in fact
constrain alternatives to low-density auto-oriented development,
one would expect developers to perceive unsatisfied market interest
in such development. This article studies, through a national
survey (676 respondents), US developers' perceptions of the market
for pedestrian- and transit-oriented development forms. Overall,
respondents perceive considerable market interest in alternative
development forms, but believe that there is inadequate supply of
such alternatives relative to market demand. Developer-respondents
attribute this gap between supply and demand principally to local
government regulation. When asked how the relaxation of these
regulations would affect their product, majorities of developers
indicated that such liberalization woud lead them to develop in a
denser and more mixed-use fashion, particularly in close-in
suburban locales. Results are interpreted in favor of land-policy
reform based on the expansion of choice in transportation and land
use. This view contrasts with a more prevalent approach which
conditions policy interventions on scientific evidence of
travel-behavior modification.
},
annote = {
An excellent article, rebutting the claims of many others in the
research community. The abstract is an excellent summary of the
points made in this article. References BoaCra01, EwiCer01, Cra99
and Dow92. The latter is quoted: ``[T]he belief that sprawl is
caused primarily by market failures is based on the false
assumption that there is a freely operating land use market in US
metropolitan areas. No metropolitan area has anything remotely
approaching a free land use market because of local regulations
adopted for parochial political, social and fiscal purposes.''
}
}
@article{LevInaTor05,
author = {Jonathan Levine and Aseem Inam and Gwo-Wei Torng},
title = {A Choice-Based Rationale for Land Use and Transportation
Alternatives: Evidence from {B}oston and {A}tlanta},
year = 2005,
journal = {Journal of Planning Education and Research},
volume = 24,
pages = {317--330},
doi = {10.1177/0739456X04267714},
keywords = {land use transport link, equity, travel behaviour, zoning},
quality = 5,
annote = {
Some great equity context, including the Tiebout hypothesis.
}
}
@techreport{MooTho94,
author = {Terry Moore and Paul Thorsnes},
title = {The Transportation/Land Use Connection},
year = 1994,
month = jan,
institution = {American Planning Association},
address = {Chicago, IL, USA},
edition = {1st},
number = {448/449},
keywords = {urban economics, transport planning, urban planning, congestion pricing, transportation demand management, transit, land use transport link, zoning },
rating = 5,
status = {read},
annoteurl = { http://davidpritchard.org/sustrans/MooTho94/index.html }
}
@article{Tie56,
author = {Charles Tiebout},
title = {A pure theory of local public expenditures},
year = 1956,
journal = {Journal of Political Economy},
volume = 64,
number = 5,
pages = {416--424},
keywords = {urban politics, equity, zoning}
}
@book{Bal99,
author = {Peter C.~Baldwin},
title = {Domesticating the street: the reform of public space in
{H}artford, 1850--1930},
year = 1999,
publisher = {Ohio State University Press},
address = {Columbus, OH, USA},
keywords = {streets, history, urban politics, street design, roadspace reallocation, zoning}
}
@book{Dow94,
author = {Anthony Downs},
title = {New Visions for Metropolitan {A}merica},
year = 1994,
publisher = {The Brookings Institution},
address = {Washington, D.C., USA},
keywords = {urban planning, equity, zoning, urban politics, smart growth},
annote = {
In the first three chapters (the only part I've read), there were
some very interesting discussion of growth management policies,
equity and racial segregation in the USA.
One point I found interesting was the discussion of preferences. In
general, Americans want single-family detached houses, auto-based
travel, free parking and short travel times. The planning system
in many ways guarantees the first two: suburbs have extremely high
minimum standards for housing (low density single-family homes), and
generally provide generous roads and free parking. The last aspect
of preferences cannot be guaranteed due to growth and swamping of
existing roads by new travel, discussed at length in the book.
This is the aspect I find interesting: the system is inherently
biased towards one set of preferences (housing) and limits trading
off housing against travel time---if an individual prefers short
travel times and is willing to accept ``lower quality'' dense
housing in return, that option is rarely available. In other words,
this minimum provision limits choices, a point that Andre Sorensen
has made repeatedly in his discussions in the course I'm taking.
Downs notes that one-third of US households did not live in
single-family homes in 1990, and one-third were renters (presumably
with substantial overlap). He describes the provision of low-cost
housing as a ``trickle-down'' process: since cheap new housing is
prohibited, only degraded older houses are available for those
who cannot afford the suburban single-family home. This process
breaks down when ``net housing construciton is lower than net
household formation''---i.e., periods of rapid growth.
}
}
@article{Ham75,
author = {Bruce W.~Hamilton},
title = {Zoning and property taxation in a system of local
governments},
year = 1975,
journal = {Urban Studies},
volume = 12,
pages = {205--211},
keywords = {zoning, equity, urban planning}
}
@book{Lev05,
author = {Jonathan Levine},
title = {Zoned Out: Regulation, Markets and Choices in Transportation
and Metropolitan Land Use},
year = 2005,
month = oct,
publisher = {Resources For the Future Press},
keywords = {land use transport link, zoning}
}
@article{Pas96,
author = {Hafiz A.~Pasha},
title = {Suburban minimum lot zoning and spatial equilibrium},
year = 1996,
journal = {Journal of Urban Economics},
volume = 40,
number = 1,
pages = {1--12},
keywords = {zoning, equity, urban economics, urban planning}
}
@article{Pen99,
author = {Rolf Pendall},
title = {Do land use controls cause sprawl?},
year = 1999,
journal = {Environment and Planning B},
volume = 26,
number = 4,
pages = {555--571},
keywords = {urban planning, zoning, smart growth}
}
@article{PogSas91,
author = {J.~Pogodzinski and T.~Sass},
title = {Measuring the effects of municipal zoning regulations: a
survey},
year = 1991,
journal = {Urban Studies},
volume = 28,
pages = {497--621},
keywords = { urban planning, zoning}
}
@article{Whe93,
author = {William C.~Wheaton},
title = {Land capitalization, {T}iebout mobility and the role of zoning
regulations},
year = 1993,
journal = {Journal of Urban Economics},
volume = 34,
pages = {102--117},
keywords = {urban planning, zoning, urban economics, equity}
}
This file was generated by bibtex2html 1.91.