<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for david pritchard&#039;s personal website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidpritchard.org/personal/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidpritchard.org/personal</link>
	<description>periodic personal perceptions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:21:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A dancing mix by Karl Davis</title>
		<link>http://davidpritchard.org/personal/archives/225#comment-1136</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidpritchard.org/personal/?p=225#comment-1136</guid>
		<description>Cool, this is my 3rd DJ Dave Mix, and they never disappoint.

Thanks,
Karl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, this is my 3rd DJ Dave Mix, and they never disappoint.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Karl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A dancing mix by david</title>
		<link>http://davidpritchard.org/personal/archives/225#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 02:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidpritchard.org/personal/?p=225#comment-295</guid>
		<description>Indeed.

I&#039;ll admit that - while inspired by digging through the crates for danceable music - most of the mix is just the wrong side of the danceable / head-nodding divide.  But you knew that.

But in case it&#039;s useful, here&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://davidpritchard.org/personal/wedding_tracks.xlsx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the list of tracks&lt;/a&gt; we actually gave the DJ for the wedding.

And, I spent a while trying to find danceable music for the boomer generation, and came up with the following:

DJ Soo&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.woodnsoo.com/mixes.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Baby Boomer mix&lt;/a&gt;
DJ Penny Lane&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.umfm.com/programming/podcasts/158/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Punks in Parkas podcasts&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll admit that &#8211; while inspired by digging through the crates for danceable music &#8211; most of the mix is just the wrong side of the danceable / head-nodding divide.  But you knew that.</p>
<p>But in case it&#8217;s useful, here&#8217;s <a href="http://davidpritchard.org/personal/wedding_tracks.xlsx" rel="nofollow">the list of tracks</a> we actually gave the DJ for the wedding.</p>
<p>And, I spent a while trying to find danceable music for the boomer generation, and came up with the following:</p>
<p>DJ Soo&#8217;s <a href="http://www.woodnsoo.com/mixes.htm" rel="nofollow">Baby Boomer mix</a><br />
DJ Penny Lane&#8217;s <a href="http://www.umfm.com/programming/podcasts/158/" rel="nofollow">Punks in Parkas podcasts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A dancing mix by Eric, a haikuist</title>
		<link>http://davidpritchard.org/personal/archives/225#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric, a haikuist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 20:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidpritchard.org/personal/?p=225#comment-293</guid>
		<description>Nice.  I just happen to be putting together my own wedding reception dance mix, and my bride-to-be has informed me that my suggested all-Smiths/Cure/Depeche Mode mix might be a little... less upbeat than might be desired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice.  I just happen to be putting together my own wedding reception dance mix, and my bride-to-be has informed me that my suggested all-Smiths/Cure/Depeche Mode mix might be a little&#8230; less upbeat than might be desired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Passive Portfolio Performance, 2010 by e</title>
		<link>http://davidpritchard.org/personal/archives/209#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidpritchard.org/personal/?p=209#comment-243</guid>
		<description>What B said. If you already know all that, you probably don&#039;t need to read the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What B said. If you already know all that, you probably don&#8217;t need to read the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Passive Portfolio Performance, 2010 by b</title>
		<link>http://davidpritchard.org/personal/archives/209#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidpritchard.org/personal/?p=209#comment-242</guid>
		<description>Random Walk basically gives you the financial equivalent of the laws of thermodynamics. 
- Can&#039;t beat the market with your brain, 
- Can&#039;t even break even because of MERs and fees
- You have to play the game (or else inflation eats you)

Fairly standard passive investor philosophy. An alternative is the H.Simpson philosophy --&gt;

Bart: You make me sick, Homer. You&#039;re the one who told me I could do anything if I just put my mind to it!

Homer: Well, now that you&#039;re a little bit older, I can tell you that&#039;s a crock! No matter how good you are at something, there&#039;s always about a million people better than you.

Bart: Gotcha. Can&#039;t win, don&#039;t try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Random Walk basically gives you the financial equivalent of the laws of thermodynamics.<br />
- Can&#8217;t beat the market with your brain,<br />
- Can&#8217;t even break even because of MERs and fees<br />
- You have to play the game (or else inflation eats you)</p>
<p>Fairly standard passive investor philosophy. An alternative is the H.Simpson philosophy &#8211;&gt;</p>
<p>Bart: You make me sick, Homer. You&#8217;re the one who told me I could do anything if I just put my mind to it!</p>
<p>Homer: Well, now that you&#8217;re a little bit older, I can tell you that&#8217;s a crock! No matter how good you are at something, there&#8217;s always about a million people better than you.</p>
<p>Bart: Gotcha. Can&#8217;t win, don&#8217;t try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Passive Portfolio Performance, 2010 by david</title>
		<link>http://davidpritchard.org/personal/archives/209#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidpritchard.org/personal/?p=209#comment-240</guid>
		<description>Actually, many thanks to you Eric - I only really started down this path after hearing your advice on index funds.

I haven&#039;t actually read &lt;i&gt;A Random Walk Down Wall Street&lt;/i&gt; - is it that essential?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, many thanks to you Eric &#8211; I only really started down this path after hearing your advice on index funds.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t actually read <i>A Random Walk Down Wall Street</i> &#8211; is it that essential?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Passive Portfolio Performance, 2010 by e</title>
		<link>http://davidpritchard.org/personal/archives/209#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidpritchard.org/personal/?p=209#comment-232</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this, David! Your approach is essentially (philosophically) what I arrived at after a very expensive learning process, though the portfolio I ended up with is a bit different.

Incidentally, should I assume you&#039;ve read A Random Walk Down Wall Street?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this, David! Your approach is essentially (philosophically) what I arrived at after a very expensive learning process, though the portfolio I ended up with is a bit different.</p>
<p>Incidentally, should I assume you&#8217;ve read A Random Walk Down Wall Street?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A passive Canadian’s portfolio by blin</title>
		<link>http://davidpritchard.org/personal/archives/104#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>blin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 07:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personal.davidpritchard.org/archives/104#comment-229</guid>
		<description>Hi David, thanks for sharing. I think I&#039;m doing poorly, but I&#039;m not sure - Microsoft Money hasn&#039;t been tracking my rate of return very well. It&#039;s really difficult to tease out how it does its calculations, and the purchase price seems wrong all the time.  

Also, it suffers from the same problemyou  mentioned upthread - historical purchases in a foreign currency are converted to $CAD using today&#039;s exchange rate. 

Couple of questions for the crowd:

- Why do we talk about &#039;currency risk&#039; like it is a bad thing? Isn&#039;t there an equal chance that currency fluctuations will help us, rather than hurt us? 

- Your broad-based index funds, how do they compare to the narrow-based ones? The last time I looked at, the difference was in a fairly small tail of the smallest cap stocks (almost by .definition). Still, maybe that&#039;s where the exciting differences are?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David, thanks for sharing. I think I&#8217;m doing poorly, but I&#8217;m not sure &#8211; Microsoft Money hasn&#8217;t been tracking my rate of return very well. It&#8217;s really difficult to tease out how it does its calculations, and the purchase price seems wrong all the time.  </p>
<p>Also, it suffers from the same problemyou  mentioned upthread &#8211; historical purchases in a foreign currency are converted to $CAD using today&#8217;s exchange rate. </p>
<p>Couple of questions for the crowd:</p>
<p>- Why do we talk about &#8216;currency risk&#8217; like it is a bad thing? Isn&#8217;t there an equal chance that currency fluctuations will help us, rather than hurt us? </p>
<p>- Your broad-based index funds, how do they compare to the narrow-based ones? The last time I looked at, the difference was in a fairly small tail of the smallest cap stocks (almost by .definition). Still, maybe that&#8217;s where the exciting differences are?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wedding &amp; photos by david</title>
		<link>http://davidpritchard.org/personal/archives/190#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidpritchard.org/personal/?p=190#comment-227</guid>
		<description>The dropbox has closed. Thank you everyone for your contributions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dropbox has closed. Thank you everyone for your contributions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Passive Portfolio Performance, 2010 by david</title>
		<link>http://davidpritchard.org/personal/archives/209#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidpritchard.org/personal/?p=209#comment-226</guid>
		<description>@ZHZ -

1) To date, I haven&#039;t really optimized the cash part of my portfolio. I&#039;m usually making 0.7% in a savings account on some of the cash, 0% in a chequing account for much of the rest, and some fragments of cash scattered across my different brokerage accounts (RRSP, TFSA and non-registered).  Cash has been my lowest priority for optimization.  My top goal is to avoid bank fees by maintaining the minimum balance - bank fees are much higher than any interest I could earn on cash.  I will start looking into the various GIC and money market options soon.

2) The ETFs don&#039;t have an automatic purchase plan. They do offer a Dividend Reinvestment (DRIP) option, which I plan to activate.  I may look at an automatic purchase plan for the TDB900 mutual fund, though.  This has also been a lower priority for me - my goal has been to first get the overall allocation of assets and diversification right, then get the tax treatment right (putting appropriate assets in the RRSP / TFSA / non-registered accounts), and only then deal with minimizing my cash-on-hand. As it stands, I usually build up much bigger cash allocations during the year, then drop $5,000 - $10,000 on a few ETFs a few times per year to maintain the portfolio balance.

3) Yes, I keep the year-end weighting the same. The theoretical table above assumes that a rebalance happened at the start of 2010.  Because I&#039;m continuously contributing to my actual accounts, I usually just direct funds to whichever part of the portfolio is underweight; to date, I haven&#039;t actually had to sell anything.

4) I don&#039;t seek out high-dividend stocks. I&#039;ve only real heard of this goal among &quot;income-seeking&quot; investors - usually retirees who want their portfolio to spin out cash on a regular basis. Is there a portfolio reason to desire this class of stocks in particular?  In 2010, the returns from the equity component of my portfolio were 70% capital gains and 30% dividends.  Honestly though, I haven&#039;t heard a reason to care much other than for tax reasons near retirement - to me, capital gains and dividends are mostly equivalent.  But perhaps others have studied this more closely...

On records - to be honest, I find this very hard to do effectively, especially with an international multicurrency portfolio, in-year contributions, and so on.  I find it easier to track a &quot;target&quot; portfolio (like the one above) and do my best to keep my actual portfolio in line with the target.  If anyone knows any good, flexible software for managing a portfolio, I&#039;m all ears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ZHZ -</p>
<p>1) To date, I haven&#8217;t really optimized the cash part of my portfolio. I&#8217;m usually making 0.7% in a savings account on some of the cash, 0% in a chequing account for much of the rest, and some fragments of cash scattered across my different brokerage accounts (RRSP, TFSA and non-registered).  Cash has been my lowest priority for optimization.  My top goal is to avoid bank fees by maintaining the minimum balance &#8211; bank fees are much higher than any interest I could earn on cash.  I will start looking into the various GIC and money market options soon.</p>
<p>2) The ETFs don&#8217;t have an automatic purchase plan. They do offer a Dividend Reinvestment (DRIP) option, which I plan to activate.  I may look at an automatic purchase plan for the TDB900 mutual fund, though.  This has also been a lower priority for me &#8211; my goal has been to first get the overall allocation of assets and diversification right, then get the tax treatment right (putting appropriate assets in the RRSP / TFSA / non-registered accounts), and only then deal with minimizing my cash-on-hand. As it stands, I usually build up much bigger cash allocations during the year, then drop $5,000 &#8211; $10,000 on a few ETFs a few times per year to maintain the portfolio balance.</p>
<p>3) Yes, I keep the year-end weighting the same. The theoretical table above assumes that a rebalance happened at the start of 2010.  Because I&#8217;m continuously contributing to my actual accounts, I usually just direct funds to whichever part of the portfolio is underweight; to date, I haven&#8217;t actually had to sell anything.</p>
<p>4) I don&#8217;t seek out high-dividend stocks. I&#8217;ve only real heard of this goal among &#8220;income-seeking&#8221; investors &#8211; usually retirees who want their portfolio to spin out cash on a regular basis. Is there a portfolio reason to desire this class of stocks in particular?  In 2010, the returns from the equity component of my portfolio were 70% capital gains and 30% dividends.  Honestly though, I haven&#8217;t heard a reason to care much other than for tax reasons near retirement &#8211; to me, capital gains and dividends are mostly equivalent.  But perhaps others have studied this more closely&#8230;</p>
<p>On records &#8211; to be honest, I find this very hard to do effectively, especially with an international multicurrency portfolio, in-year contributions, and so on.  I find it easier to track a &#8220;target&#8221; portfolio (like the one above) and do my best to keep my actual portfolio in line with the target.  If anyone knows any good, flexible software for managing a portfolio, I&#8217;m all ears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

