<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canada in last place</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidpritchard.org/archives/84/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidpritchard.org/archives/84</link>
	<description>modern metropolitan mode choice, remodelled.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:02:59 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: drpritch</title>
		<link>http://davidpritchard.org/archives/84/comment-page-1#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>drpritch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 21:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidpritchard.org/archives/84#comment-39</guid>
		<description>According to the EC report (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ec.gc.ca/pdb/ghg/inventory_report/2004_report/sum_e.cfm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;executive summary&lt;/a&gt;), population growth was 15% over that period.

I&#039;m not sure about the electricity generation/consumption. I imagine BC and Quebec are exporters, due to plentiful hydroelectric; but that clearly doesn&#039;t contribute much to GHG emissions. Manitoba might export as well... not sure where they get their electricity. So I imagine most of that generation growth corresponds to consumption growth. (I suppose I could control for population growth and recalculate all these numbers... but whatever.)

I&#039;ve heard the complaints about &quot;off&quot; devices sucking juice from the wall, but I suspect it still doesn&#039;t add up to &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; much. The media loves to focus on easy/stupid fixes like that... and sure, it would be a painless thing to fix. But at the end of the day, I imagine the big culprits are still air conditioning, space heating and water heating - the painful ones that would require major behaviour change to fix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the EC report (<a href="http://www.ec.gc.ca/pdb/ghg/inventory_report/2004_report/sum_e.cfm" rel="nofollow">executive summary</a>), population growth was 15% over that period.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure about the electricity generation/consumption. I imagine BC and Quebec are exporters, due to plentiful hydroelectric; but that clearly doesn&#8217;t contribute much to GHG emissions. Manitoba might export as well&#8230; not sure where they get their electricity. So I imagine most of that generation growth corresponds to consumption growth. (I suppose I could control for population growth and recalculate all these numbers&#8230; but whatever.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard the complaints about &#8220;off&#8221; devices sucking juice from the wall, but I suspect it still doesn&#8217;t add up to <i>that</i> much. The media loves to focus on easy/stupid fixes like that&#8230; and sure, it would be a painless thing to fix. But at the end of the day, I imagine the big culprits are still air conditioning, space heating and water heating &#8211; the painful ones that would require major behaviour change to fix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Pritchard</title>
		<link>http://davidpritchard.org/archives/84/comment-page-1#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Pritchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidpritchard.org/archives/84#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Wow, we&#039;re pathetic. Great summary! I inhaled that Economist special report on climate change; it&#039;s really well-written.

Incidentally, do you know what the population growth has been from 1990-2004?

I wonder- is the growth in electricty generation the same as electricity consumption? Or does Canada import/export a significant fraction of its electricty?

I&#039;ve recent heard estimates that per capita electricity usage in San Diego is skyrocketing due at least in part to &quot;phantom&quot; electrical devices; as offices/houses generally have increasing numbers of gismos plugged into the wall, which may be &quot;sleeping&quot; but not off...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, we&#8217;re pathetic. Great summary! I inhaled that Economist special report on climate change; it&#8217;s really well-written.</p>
<p>Incidentally, do you know what the population growth has been from 1990-2004?</p>
<p>I wonder- is the growth in electricty generation the same as electricity consumption? Or does Canada import/export a significant fraction of its electricty?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve recent heard estimates that per capita electricity usage in San Diego is skyrocketing due at least in part to &#8220;phantom&#8221; electrical devices; as offices/houses generally have increasing numbers of gismos plugged into the wall, which may be &#8220;sleeping&#8221; but not off&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
